NHL
NHL Rules Changes Worth Considering
Former NHL player Mike Johnson, on a recent segment on NHL Network, proposed three interesting rule changes.
The on-screen title read: New rules we would like to see.
Johnson’s Twitter handle is @mike_p_johnson and his bio reads: Former NHL player and current NHL analyst.
Johnson, a forward, played 11 NHL seasons for Toronto, Tampa Bay, Phoenix, Montreal and St. Louis. He scored 129 goals and 246 assists (375 points) in 661 NHL games.
The Proposed Rules
“We’re going to allow hand passes by every player in every zone,” Johnson proposed to his NHL Network audience.
“So, there’s no reason why a defensive team, if the puck’s in the air, I can grab it and give it and break it out. But an offensive player, I can’t grab it and give it to an opponent in the offensive zone.
“Why would I not have the same rules for the offensive team as the defensive team? You can’t pick it up and you can’t put it in the net but you can pass it to a teammate.”
My view: This is a great idea. Agree with Johnson: The rules should be the same here for offense and defense.
Johnson’s Next Suggestion
“Any goal off a skate counts, no matter what. Here’s my safety amendment — except in the blue paint.”
My view: Again, I agree. The replays on pucks that go off skates into the net are ridiculous. Was it a kicking motion? Did we know the player’s intent? Did the player twist his skate ever so slightly to get the deflection?
I always think these off-the-skate goals are inaccurately called 50 percent of the time — in both directions. Good goals are waived off. What look like obvious kicking-motion goals are allowed. Let them all in!
Johnson’s Final Suggestion
“There is no high-stick rules for goals. If I do it here [waist level] and that’s how high the net is — brilliant, skill play. If I do it here [raises hand slightly higher], now it’s illegal?
“People don’t swing their sticks around at pucks. And if you do and you hit them in the head, guess what? You go to the [penalty] box and you don’t get to come out when they score two goals.
“So, don’t swing your stick around … They put that rule in place, swinging at the puck, because no one wore helmets. Now they have helmets and visors. So you’re not going to take anyone’s eye or nose out, just some teeth.Â
“Plus you can’t review high-sticks [goals]. The angle never quite works out.”
My view: Noooooooo. The league shouldn’t want players taking red-blooded swings from any angle at the puck. I can find some common ground if a player’s stick is above the crossbar and the puck deflects in without a swinging motion.
“Just some teeth,” should be a deterrent, not a reason to consider.
————
Flyers, In Case You Missed It:
For Flyers president Keith Jones, it’s the calm before the camp.
Remembering the Flyers’ best playoff run that didn’t win the Stanley Cup.
Around The National Hockey Network:
Boston Hockey Now: Will Bruins make a push for Jets center Mark Scheifele?
Chicago Hockey Now: Can Blackhawks prospect Gavin Hayes keep his goal-scoring going?
Colorado Hockey Now: Avalanche prospect Nikolai Kovalenko has huge opening game in KHL.
Detroit Hockey Now: Patrick Kane to the Red Wings?
Florida Hockey Now: Grading ESPN’s point projections for Panthers.
Los Angeles Hockey Now: Have Kings opened their Stanley Cup window?
Montreal Hockey Now: Contracts from previous GM causing a problem for current Canadiens GM.
New York Islanders Hockey Now: Five biggest Isles wins of last season.
Pittsburgh Hockey Now: Five favorite road trips for Penguins fans.
San Jose Hockey Now: Sharks’ top-10 prospect rankings, 2010-23.
I disagree with these 3 proposals. They’re nothing that makes the sport more exciting. They seem very rushed like he was given 30 seconds to come up with 3 propsed changes spur of the moment. How about eliminate the shootout? Which is still a circus like gimmick IMO. Or play a man down a full 2 mins (like a major) regardless of how many goals are scored on a power play/penalty kill? Or require a team that is losing by 2 goals (or more) to pull the Goalie with 45 seconds remaining (with a mandatory TV timeout like Football’s 2 min warning) and can only bring the Goalie back if they tie it up?
I’ve always liked the idea of scoring as many times as you can on any kind of penalty. Your pull-the-goalie idea is interesting.
True story: When the NHL first implemented the shootout, the Philadelphia Daily News night sports desk would (mostly) stop working to gather around the TV to watch. It was fresh and new and very exciting. The Flyers weren’t good at shootouts then, either, as I recall. Over time, the shootout has lost some luster, for sure.
Thanks for your comments.
CB
I agree about the shootout. It was exciting for a while but it’s not real hockey. I don’t like the 3-on-3 overtime, either. Also not real hockey and it’s become a keep-away game once a team gets possession. Play a five-minute overtime and call it a tie if no one scores, like they used to do.
Also, I am tired of someone starting a fight when a teammate is legally body-checked. I get you want to stand up for a teammate but if it’s a clean check, it’s part of the game. Accept it; no need to attack the guy who threw the check. Instigation penalty and 10-minute misconduct for a player who does that.
I agree with Flyerguy88 100% about getting rid of the shootout. That’s a terrible way to determine a game. I’d prefer a tie over that. Plus the 2 point game vs 3 point game factor. The hand pass change I could live with. My concern with the skate rule is the safety factor even with the blue paint exception. Maybe any goal off a skate doesn’t count. It’s kind of a “meh” way to score a goal anyway. And no to the high-stick rule.